Are You Worried About Your Food Being “Modified”?

Here are two areas of concern to those of us that care about the source of our food. First, here’s a 26-minute video on Genetically Modified Foods: Genetically Modified Foods
John at my local food co-op gets credit for turning me on to this much longer video (nearly two hours) called The World According to Monsanto. Some interesting stuff here about how Monsanto operates, the FDA-corporate revolving door, pollution cover-ups, and all kinds of other fun times.
And finally, hat tip to Chris at Conditioning Research for this article: Once bitten …
Welcome to the world of nanofoods, where almost anything is possible: where food can be manipulated at an atomic or molecular level to taste as delicious as you want, do you as much good as you want, and stay fresh for … well, who knows? A world where smart pesticides are harmless until they reach the stomachs of destructive insects; where food manufacturers promise an end to starvation; where smart packaging sniffs out and destroys the micro-organisms that make good food go bad.
Frankly, I don’t like the idea of any tampering with the food. I don’t like the idea of genetically modified foods and I don’t like the idea of someone using nanotechnology to make my food “better”. Somehow, humans and the rest of the natural world survived with food “genetically engineered” by evolution. There are too many unknown risks with GM crops and nanotechnology to know if putting them into the body is a good idea. I’ll take the real ice cream over the stuff with microencapsulated fat molecules. Unprocessed foods will always be better than processed foods.
I think two things are very telling. First, the public is not excited about GM crops. Everywhere they go, protesters follow. Second, Monsanto, ADM, and the other agribusiness companies are not willing to have their products labeled as genetically modified. Monsanto doesn’t want milk labeled as rBGH-free. It doesn’t want soy labeled as GM, nor corn or any other foods. In a truly free market, food would be labeled as “GM”. If the public wants it or is indifferent, the GM foods will stand on their own merits, not on the force of an $8.5 billion company that wants to keep consumers from being able to control where their food comes from and what they put into their bodies. Whether GM crops and nanotechnology prove to be beneficial and safe or not, it is scary that many, from the corporations to our own politicians, will work hard to keep consumers from knowing what they are eating.
Anyone have any other thoughts?
If you enjoyed this post, share it on StumbleUpon or Health Ranker (or both!)
- Other Stuff You'll Enjoy:
- What I’m Reading: The Revolution Will Not Be Microwaved
- Milk, Does It Do A Body Good? Part 3: The Raw Debate - A Tale of Two Milks
- Underground Wellness Videos: Real Food and Cholesterol
- Eating Cloned Animals
- Here We Go With The Functional Foods Nonsense
Print This Post
Filed in Nutritionism 3 Comments so far
Subscribe


Troy on 16 Apr 2008 at 3:20 pm #
If its not this its something else…i can’t stand it anymore!!! The government and chemical corporations, or what other powers be want to suppress all of our immune systems! How will they to it…with pharmicuetical drugs, GM food, Irradiation, chemicals in food, Chemicals in everything, more EMF’s, and Chemtrails to name a few! THis is how they create the sheep like syndrome in people…those people that don’t care…who set around and watch t.v. all day and eat cheetos, and stay sick! We need to get more people aware of this…especailly with websites like this people have been putting up all over the web…Lets turn this system around on them! We live in one Toxic Age!
K.A. on 17 Apr 2008 at 2:52 pm #
I am seriously considering going to Europe, where people are much saner. No GMOs allowed outside of the lab, no Iraq war bullshit, no anti-choicers codifying their misogynist mental diseases. It’s so hard to get citizenship anywhere though!
owen bruhn on 18 Apr 2008 at 4:58 am #
Hi
I’m compleltly persuaded by the IF\paleo model and have practicised it for years (IF for nearly 2 years, paleo for several).
It seems that overall the entire scientific/medical community cant even agree on what is the best diet. This would probably be a good idea before any one starts tinkering with genes.
Then there is the “great” idea of creating peanuts free of allergy (dont eat peanuts myself, dont like lectins). Seems good. The folks who cant eat allergic peanuts can have the allergy free ones– unless some one colour codes them…how will they be told apart? I suppose people could employ a taster like in the middle ages wait for a minute or whatever- no anaphylactic shock and it would be ok to eat the nuts. Another idea would be purple peanuts– a coloured die put here by more gene modifications.
Humanity should be genetic engineering of food off for another 100 years or so.
OB