Diet Overkill: 25 Of the Most Ridiculous (and Ineffective) Popular Diets
I was sent a link to this article via my Contact Form, so I thought I’d give my thoughts on it: Diet Overkill: 25 Of the Most Ridiculous (and Ineffective) Popular Diets. There are 25 of them, so I’m not going to go through every one, but let’s take a look at what Ms. Hupp has to say about these diets.
Atkins: Although wildly popular, and quite effective for some people, the Atkins diet is just not sustainable for most dieters. This diet cuts out healthy foods like fruit, and adopts a limited list of foods that are often high in fat and otherwise unhealthy. Above all, this diet’s extreme restriction makes it incredibly difficult for most people to stick with it.
So the Atkins Diet is #1 on the list, though there’s no mention of whether they’re in any kind of order of least to most effective, so I’ll just assume they’re in no particular order. My first thought is that someone hasn’t done their homework. When I look at the Atkins site on their Maintenance Phase Food Pyramid, I see that fruits are the third level of the pyramid. Fruits are restricted initially, but that’s only for two weeks before gradually reintroducing them.
The commentary also makes the assumption that fat is bad with the phrase “foods that are often high in fat and otherwise unhealthy”. As we all know, fat is a necessary and essential nutrient, much more so than carbohydrates. And Jimmy Moore has plenty of chronicles of people that have managed to stay on the diet for the long-term, including himself. I don’t particularly like the use of the low-carb processed products that many people use, but if one uses real, whole foods, this diet is just fine.
The tapeworm diet: Almost too disgusting to detail, this diet involves swallowing cysts that you’ve dissected out of beef carcass. The plan is to allow the tapeworm to live in you for up to 10 weeks, and then take prescribed medication to kill it. It should go without saying that this is perhaps one of the most dangerous diets you can adopt. It not only requires you to ingest a parasite, it encourages unhealthy eating habits, which are almost guaranteed to make you gain every pound back once the worm is gone.
The Weight Loss Cure They Don’t Want You to Know About: This diet gives the tapeworm a run for its money. Why? The weight loss “cure” consists of nothing more than ingesting the urine of pregnant women. Whether this is effective or not really doesn’t matter-there is absolutely, positively, a better way to lose weight than injecting yourself with pee.
Ok, now those diets are just dumb.
Hallelujah Diet; Slim Fast; The Hollywood Diet; The Martha’s Vineyard Diet; Dr. Siegal’s Cookie Diet; The Wu-Yi Tea Diet
All of these are based on purchasing a specific product, which the creator of the diet just happens to sell. How convenient! I think I don’t need to point out that any diet that requires you to purchase their specific product is probably going to lighten nothing other than your wallet.
The Fiengold diet: Dr. Benjamin Feingold created a diet free of chemicals believed to cause ADD and ADHD. This included not only food, but also certain drugs and hygiene items. Although this diet is not physically harmful, and can be helpful in some instances, it’s generally not wise to adopt this regimen. Critics warn against teaching children that food can dictate performance and behavior, and depriving them of appropriate professional help from doctors. [emphasis added]
Looking at the last line, I have to laugh. Why should we not teach children the truth, that foods can and do affect the way the body performs and can affect behavior? I can see not depriving kids access to doctors, but let’s face facts. Everything you eat affects how your body performs. Think about how you feel after that spaghetti lunch. Should we not teach kids that they feel so sluggish and run down because of what they ate? And it’s simply horrible to have kids eating foods without synthetic additives (i.e., real food), though it should be pointed out that not all processed foods are eliminated - only those containing certain additives. Ms. Hupp even points out that the diet causes no physical harm, so why is this one on here? I don’t know enough about the diet to say it’s effective, but it doesn’t sound like one of “the most ridiculous (and ineffective) popular diets”.
So I have to ask how many of these diets you all have actually heard of? I think the author started grabbing unheard of diets and put them in an article about “popular diets”. I can’t say The Tapeworm Diet has ever crossed my radar. Nor has the “Drink Pregnant Women’s Urine Diet.” I have a feeling 25 made a nice round number and some searching was done to find some of these. Overall, the whole article seems to be focusing on “intake,” otherwise known as calories, which ignores the very real hormonal effects of every single thing that goes into your mouth. I’m a bit concerned that a website for future nurses is either ignoring or ignorant of the real workings of the body. Basically, she says that nearly every diet is ridiculous and ineffective: low-carb, low-fat, macrobiotic…you name it, it’s on here. But what she doesn’t do is tell readers what they should eat.
When it comes down to it, a diet based on unprocessed foods is the one your body has evolved for. What are unprocessed foods? Meat and seafood, eggs, vegetables, fruit, nuts, and seeds. There’s no such thing as an unprocessed grain (even “whole grains” are processed), though a bit of grain here and there isn’t going to kill you. Nor is pasteurized and homogenized dairy an unprocessed food. Raw milk is unprocessed and may fit into your diet if your body tolerates it without mucus production or digestive issues. While I prefer a diet higher in protein and fat, so long as you’re sticking to the above list of food, you’ll probably be just fine at most any macronutrient level. It’s amazing that once you go to eating real food, the body tells you what it wants as long as you’re not too stubborn to listen.
If you enjoyed this post, share it on StumbleUpon or Health Ranker (or both!)
- Other Stuff You'll Enjoy:
- New Study Shows Low-Carb Better Than Low-Fat or Mediterranean Diets; AHA Still Has Head In Sand
- Atkins Diet Damages Blood Vessels?
- Email Exchange with Dr. Bryant Stamford
- The Atkins Paradox?
- What I’m Reading: Good Calories, Bad Calories
Posts from 1 year ago:
Feeding Your Pets, Part Deux
Print This Post
Filed in Diets (Paleo, Atkins, Etc) 6 Comments so far
Subscribe


DaveC on 27 Feb 2008 at 11:59 am #
Misunderstanding of Atkins is quite common–I see comments all the time that indicate people are reacting to some misconcieved notion of what it is. There are some legitimate areas that you can pick at depending on your beliefs (such as balancing Omega-6s with Omega-3s or limiting processed foods), but all-in-all it’s still a much better option for most folks then the grain/sugar filled diets they are on.
Erin on 27 Feb 2008 at 4:01 pm #
Very helpful post (as per usual).
Something you mentioned in here goes along with some thoughts that have really had me debating where/how I want to proceed as far as my medical school hopes go.
“I’m a bit concerned that a website for future nurses is either ignoring or ignorant of the real workings of the body.”
I’m only a post-bacc pre-med student with limited knowledge of pretty much everything I’m actually supposed to know a lot about…but the more medically oriented people I meet and work with, the more I notice that “the workings of the body” is EXACTLY what they seem to have a minimal instinct for. Instead, it seems to be replaced by a kind of taught “address the symptoms, not the problem” kind of medicine. I have, in fact, watched my roommate (a nursing student about to take her boards) go through scores of pharmacology and pathology books but hardly have a sense of how the systems of the body flow.
Don’t know if I’m making any sense but this is very frustrating to someone who’d like to become a medical doctor in the future. Where do I go to know I’ll learn most of the right things? Any further posts or words on your opinion of medicine and medical education today would be much appreciated.
Thanks,
Erin
Dr. Garrett Smith on 28 Feb 2008 at 10:31 am #
Erin,
Scott asked me to help comment on your question.
Your frustration with conventional medicine is well-founded, being that you want to work “with” the body to help truly fix problems as opposed to simply suppressing symptoms.
I’m a licensed naturopathic physician in Arizona, and I was taught medicine in a way that works with the understanding of the human body and how it functions. Here’s an example that frustrates me to no end with conventional medicine.
Gastroenterologists. Patients come to see them with digestive complaints, right? Most of the time they have a whole gamut of tests run on them (or not), and then they are given drugs. Even layperson patients seem to grasp the idea, when I present it to them, that if the digestive system has chronic problems that there is likely something in the diet that is irritating the gut. It just makes sense. Yet most of my patients, who are usually coming to me after seeing the gastro, were never asked to change their diet (and many wonder why not).
One amazing thing is how many people are gluten intolerant (not celiac, but hypersensitive to gluten). The simple elimination of the gluten grains helps many in ways that folks often find unbelievable (ie. thyroid disorders). Yet the testing for celiac in conventional medicine is the OLDEST (ie. most out-of-date) test in conventional medicine today.
I could go on and on. Basically, if you want to go into a field of medicine that truly strives to “treat the cause” of disease, I highly suggest you look into accredited naturopathic medical schools (yes, they do graduate REAL doctors, even though not every single state licenses us). If you wanted to come to my office and shadow me, you’re welcome to call and we’ll discuss it.
For more information see this website, which links to all of the accredited ND schools in the US and Canada:
http://www.aanmc.org/
If you’d like to see posts of mine on message boards, to see what kind of perspective a physician like myself has, go to the http://www.CrossFit.com or the http://www.PerformanceMenu.com message boards and search under “Garrett Smith”. Or you could go to my website (linked to my name here) and see the articles there that I’ve written.
BTW, any doctor that has the intention of “treating the cause” and chooses to learn about how to work with the body to help it heal itself (doctors do no actual “healing” of the body, only the body does that work) can do that. That’s just not the goal of the education that conventional medicine provides these days, so you’d have to teach yourself all of that stuff after medical school.
Hope that helps!
Scott Kustes on 28 Feb 2008 at 11:57 am #
Thanks Dr. G. I knew you could field that one better than I could.
Cheers
Scott
sarena on 28 Feb 2008 at 7:09 pm #
Wow Dr G now I know why I have trusted you, “sight unseen” for the last year!! Thanks!
Migraineur on 04 Mar 2008 at 9:58 am #
Oh, well, the problem the Feingold diet is that if you tell a kid that any food, no matter how terrible it really is, is actually bad for them, you’ll give them an eating disorder!
Yes, that’s me being sarcastic. But I think that’s exactly the reasoning behind the widespread objection to dietary treatments for children.
Nowadays there’s even some talk of creating a new category of eating disorder called “orthorexia,” or obsession with eating healthy foods. I’m still scratching my head over this one - it’s certainly possible that obsessing over healthy eating could interfere with one’s daily functioning, especially if everyone else is eating crap. And yet, I can’t help wondering if some purveyor of junk like ADM or Cargill is really behind this push. I predict that within a decade people like you and me and all your readers are going to get labelled as orthorexics and confined to the hospital and fed Twinkies against our will.